APPENDIX TO
CHAPTER 3
The Line-Up: Corporate Crime
Robert A. G. Monks
This appendix was originally written as
part of Chapter 3 (under Danger Number 4), but it grew too long! The sheer volume of examples contained
herein provides ample proof of the persistence of corporate crime.
Large
household-name corporations live down crime as easily as photogenic people. The
only difference is that in most cases top corporate managers almost never have
to have to serve jail time.[1] When senior executives are caught
red-handed on videotape (remember Archer Daniels Midland?), all is forgiven and
forgotten after the fines are paid.
Even when it comes to the national
defense, the public seems impervious to company wrongdoing. Consider Boeing
Corporation.
·
A sting called
Operation Undercover exposed the seedy side of Boeing in 1980, but less than
three years later, reports Louis Pasztor in
When The Pentagon Was for Sale,
“Boeing made the list of the ten ‘most admired’ companies, alongside popular
consumer-goods marketers such as Procter & Gamble, Wal-Mart Stores, and
Coca-Cola.”[2]
·
In the four
years from 1990 to February 1994, Boeing had paid nearly $20 million dollars to
settle four lawsuits against it for fraud, waste, and/or abuse, yet by
mid-1997, the company was the darling of the nation.[3] The Clinton Administration threatened a
trade war against Europe if the European Commission would not approve the
giant’s merger with McDonnell Douglas (completed midnight, August 1, 1997).
The financial rewards of most corporate
wrongdoing are so high and the costs so low (as discussed in Chapter 3) that
criminal activity is all too common. One of the few tools that U.S. corporate
crime fighters have at their disposal is the False Claims Act, which punishes
corporations that try to defraud the government. Not surprisingly, many of the
major government contractors have tried to weaken this law, especially those
that had paid fines under the law in previous years. After all, in 1994, the
U.S. government had already recovered
$588 million in fines from these companies over a period of four years.
Fortunately, this lobbying effort failed. From 1994 to 1996, the government
collected an additional $2 billion in fines under the Act.[4]
Here is a list of the companies that
signed the lobbying paper, followed by the number of settled fraud cases from
1990 to 1994 involving these companies: The Boeing Company (4); Eaton
Corporation (2); FMC Corporation (0), General Electric (16); Grumman
Corporation (5); GTE Government Systems (0); Honeywell Inc. (3); Hughes
Aircraft Company (9); Litton Industries (4); Magnavox Electronics (3); Martin
Marietta Corp. (5); McDonnell Douglas (4); Newport News Shipbuilding (11);
Northrup Corporation (4); Raytheon Company (4); Rockwell International (4);
Sunstrand Corporation (1); Teledyne Corporation (5); Texas Instruments (3); TRW
Inc. (1); Unisys Corporation (2); United Technologies (3).[5]
It is obvious from this list that fraud is a common practice at defense
contractors, especially General Electric.
The marketplace seems indifferent to the
sources of corporate gain, even when it is ill-gotten. And the press is quick
to forget yesterday’s dirt in the search for today’s gold. In a February 1994
cover story, Fortune looked at “Jack Welch’s Nightmare on Elm Street”
(the nightmare being scandal-plagued Kidder Peabody) and concluded that “misdeeds ... are not an isolated case at
GE.” Yet just two years later, in its January 1996 issue, Fortune crowned GE’s charismatic leader Jack Welch as America’s
most successful generator of shareholder value.
A
Litany of Sins
Here is an
incomplete list of GE’s wrongdoings over the past decade, based in part on the Fortune list, and in part on a February
1997 report by the Project on Government Oversight in Washington, D.C.[6] Only major settled incidents are listed.
1985 GE pleads guilty to fraud charges for overcharging the Air
Force on its Minuteman missile contract; GE agrees to pay $2 million in
criminal and civil penalties.
1989 GE settles four civil suits brought by whistleblowers who
alleged that GE cheated the government out of millions of dollars by issuing
faulty time cards. GE pays some $3.5 million.
1990 GE is convicted of defrauding the Defense Department by
overcharging the Army for a battlefield computer system. GE pays $30 million in
penalties for that and other defense contracting overcharges.
1992 GE pleads guilty to defrauding the Pentagon of more than $30
million in the sale of military jet engines to Israel after an employee
received bribes. GE pays $69 million in fines.
1993 GE’s NBC News unit issues an on-air apology to General
Motors for staging a misleading simulated crash test. NBC agrees to pay GM’s
estimated $1 million legal and investigation expenses.
1995 GE pays $7.1 million to settle a lawsuit alleging that the company failed
to satisfy electrical bonding requirements for its jet engine contracts,
thereby creating a safety risk. Also, in a separate development, GE and Martin
Marietta together paid $5.87 million to settle a lawsuit associated with improper
sales of radar systems to Egypt.
1997 GE loses a lawsuit filed in the Federal
court of Canada in Toronto. Justice Bud
Cullen ruled in favor of the plaintiff, Whirlpool, which alleged that GE
violated its patent on dual-action agitators with flexible fins. GE plans to appeal.[7]
Considering
these crimes, one must ask: how can a company that breaks the law so often do
so well in equity markets? High
shareholder value and high corporate crime go together quite well, the answer
may come, so if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.
The problem is that the current system for assessing shareholder value
is about to break, and there will be no fixing. Instead, there will be a major
change in how we value corporations.
[1] Rare exceptions proving this rule are
two 1995 fraud cases—Gary Singer,
co-chairman of Cooper Companies, sentenced to 18 months in U.S. prison, and
Didier Pineau-Valencienne, chairman of Schneider, sentenced to 12 days in
Belgian prison for alleged crimes against Belgian shareholders)
[2] Louis Pasztor, When the Pentagon Was for Sale: Inside
America’s Biggest Defense Scandal (New York: Charles Scribners & Sons,
1995), p. 264.
[3] Survey
of Defense Contractor Signatories of the ‘Position Paper: Reform of the Federal
Civil False Claims Act’ ” (Washington, D.C., Project on Government
Oversight, January 1994).
[4] Terence P. Parre, “Jack Welch’s
Nightmare on Wall Street,” Fortune,
September 5, 1994; Defense and Health
Care Industries: Rather than Clean up their Act, They Attack the Act
(Washington, D.C.: Project on Government
Oversight, February 1997).
5 Only 11 of the cases cited against the 20
companies were False Claims Act cases, but those cases recovered over $125
million for the government. Source: “Defense Companies that Lobby for Weaker
False Claims Act Have Defrauded Government, Study Finds,” Corporate Crime Reporter, Volume 8, Number 9 (February 28, 1994),
pp. 2-3.
[6] Defense
and Health Care Industries, op. cit. (note 4).
[7] William M. Carley, “A Load Off Its Mind: Whirlpool Beats Foe in Washer Action, The Wall Street Journal, September 15, 997, pp. A1, A6.