Translation of an article printed in the Nikkei Financial Daily
August 29, 2002

 


Severe earthquake of corporate America A battle of fathers No.3 <No.1-Warren Buffett, No.2-John C. Bogle, No.4-Paul Volcker and so on> Mr. Robert Monks Pioneer of corporate governance says:" Reform has just started." He has called for expansion of voting   <Text> The AGM of ExxonMobil, which was held in Texas, Dallas on May 29th, underwent a big change. A shareholder proposal, which sought to exploit alternative energy to fossil fuels for environmental conservation, was supported by over 20%. Similar proposals had been supported by less than 10% in usual years.  A sudden jump in a supporting rating attracted attention as an example to show groundswell of shareholders' awareness regarding social responsibility of companies as well as groundswell of social interests regarding global warming and other environmental problems. This proposal was said to be supported by ISS as well as CalPERS. It was Robert Monks (68) , a famous pioneer of shareholder activists, who supported the environmental conservation group to submit the shareholder proposal.

Robert Monks is the main player, who has clarified fiduciary duty of pension investment in US, promoted voting by pension funds and produced the origin of shareholder activists such as CalPERS. ISS, which played a role in the EGM this spring by supporting merger between Hewlett Packard and Compaq, was actually established by Robert Monks. It can readily be said that he has set up an infrastructure of corporate governance in USA. Big changes appeared one after another on AGMs in USA this year. A shareholder proposal, asked that an AGM approval should be necessary for a large-scale stock options, was approved by the AGM of Mentor Graphics. This was proposed by TIAA-CREF. It is rare that a shareholder proposal passed an AGM even in USA. Shareholders' consciousness has changed in the wake of Enron. NYSE listing code was revised and Sarbenes-Oxley Act was enacted by Bush administration with unusual speed.  Robert Monks said: " I have never seen such a groundswell of following wind for corporate governance in my 30-year career."

Robert Monks was appointed Administrator of the Office of Pension of the U.S. Department of Labour in 1984, and served in that position until 1985. He concluded in that voting of holding stocks was a fiduciary duty for institutional investors, getting on legal interpretation of ERISA. He established ISS in 1985 when he left  U.S. Department of Labour. His idea was that service to help voting was necessary for institutional investors to execute voting efficiently. His subordinate officer at U.S. Department of Labour in 1988 announced the Avon Letter, which officially acknowledged the obligation of voting for pension investors for the first time. ISS utilised this opportunity to get customers such as CalPERS, TIAA-CREF, Fidelity Investments and so on. He bought 100 stocks of Sears, Roebuck in 1991 and became a NED candidate at its AGM. Although he failed to get majority of shareholders, he shot to the world the fundamental question that who was the owner of a company and what was a NED. He launched LENDS, which was a fund to engage actively in invested companies as a shareholder, in 1992 and it achieved high performance in 90's

 Robert Monks warned that  Sarbenes-Oxley Act was just a start and never should be the last while he thought highly of the current movement to reform corporate governance . He pointed out that research for alleged involvement by JP Morgan Chase and Merrill Lynch in accounting scandal of Enron was the focus from now on. He also complained about current institutional investors in USA.He severely criticised them and said:" It is extremely unbalanced. All shareholders activities are done by public pension funds. Private pensions and investment trust companies have done nothing." Although companies tend to increase the number of NEDs, he still warned and said: "Corporate management have to have shareholders express their opinions easily and have their pension funds engage aggressively in invested companies. American capitalism will not be healthy unless owners, or shareholders, activate and be competent."   MItazono Tetsuharu in New York